29 June 2026 to 3 July 2026
EICC, Edinburgh
Europe/London timezone

Pedestal structure and stability of ECRH-only heated plasmas in TCV, comparison with NBI-only heated plasmas

Not scheduled
20m
EICC, Edinburgh

EICC, Edinburgh

150 Morrison St, Edinburgh EH3 8EE
Poster Presentation Edge and Pedestal Physics (MCF)

Speaker

Arnaud Lafay Labrosse (KTH, Royal Institute of Technology)

Description

ITER is planned to start operation using radiofrequency (RF) only, with a high fraction of heating power using electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH). Typically, most machines heat the plasma either with neutral beam injection (NBI) only or with a combination of RF and NBI heating. Between ECRH and NBI, the particle sources and the heating distribution between ions and electrons are different. These differences can influence the pedestal transport and stability, and the pedestal structure in H-mode. The goal of the work is to compare the pedestal structure and stability in TCV between plasmas heated only with ECRH and plasmas heated only with NBI, and to understand if and how the heating scheme affects the pedestal performance. Experiments were conducted in TCV with $I_p=170 \mathrm{kA}$ and $B_t=1.44\mathrm{T}$, for a high triangularity shape, without baffles and without seeding. At similar gas rate and absorbed power, it is found that NBI heating leads to larger pedestal top density $n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ and similar separatrix density $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}$ compared to ECRH heating. Therefore, the ECRH pulse has larger $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}/n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ than the NBI pulse, leading to an outward shift of the pressure pedestal. In consequence, the ECRH pulse has lower temperature and higher resistivity at the position of the maximum gradient compared to the ECRH pulse. Calculating the stability boundary with ideal and resistive MHD, it is found that the NBI pulse is well described by both ideal and resistive MHD, while the ECRH pulse is far from the ideal MHD stability boundary and well described by resistive MHD. These results are extended to the rest of the dataset, in which ECRH pulses have typically lower $n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ and similar $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}$ compared to NBI pulses. The increase in $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}/n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ is correlated with an outward shift of the pressure pedestal and an increase in the resistivity at the position of the maximum pressure gradient. MHD stability analysis show that ideal MHD is sufficient to describe the low $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}/n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ NBI-heated pulses, while resistive MHD is necessary to describe the high $n_e^{\mathrm{sep}}/n_e^{\mathrm{ped}}$ ECRH-heated pulses, due to the higher resistivity.

Author

Arnaud Lafay Labrosse (KTH, Royal Institute of Technology)

Co-authors

Lorenzo Frassinetti (KTH, Royal Institute of Technology) Benoît Labit (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) - SPC) Mario Ludovico Podesta (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) - SPC) Reinart Andreas J. Coosemans (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) - SPC) Adriano Stagni (Consorzio RFX (CNR, ENEA, INFN, Università di Padova, Acciaierie Venete SpA), Padova, Italy) Artur Perek (EPFL) Riccardo Morgan (SPC EPFL) Olle Sundberg (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) Samuli Saarelma (UKAEA Culham, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3DB, United Kingdom) the TCV team (See the author list of C. Theiler et al 2026 Nucl. Fusion 66 116007) the EUROfusion Tokamak exploitation team (See the author list of N. Vianello et al 2026 Nucl. Fusion 66 116010)

Presentation materials