29 June 2026 to 3 July 2026
EICC, Edinburgh
Europe/London timezone

Predict-first integrated modeling of WEST long pulse operation with combined ECRH/ECCD and LHCD

Not scheduled
20m
EICC, Edinburgh

EICC, Edinburgh

150 Morrison St, Edinburgh EH3 8EE
Poster Presentation Scenario Development, Heating and Current Drive (MCF)

Description

The WEST tokamak provides key insights into long pulse operation in a full tungsten environment, anticipating challenges for ITER-like reactors. WEST Lower Hybrid Current Drive (LHCD) enables fully non-inductive regimes and has sustained plasmas for up to 22 minutes. However, its off-axis power and current deposition constrain the operational space in plasma current, density, and injected power. In particular, insufficient central heating can prevent tungsten burn-through and increase the risk of core radiative collapses when radiation losses exceed absorbed power [1] and reduced on-axis current drive may lead to safety factor reversal and degraded MHD stability [2].

A new ECRH system [3] is currently under commissioning to extend this operational domain, with the objective of reaching up to 3 MW for 10 s. The impact of ECRH/ECCD on WEST operation is assessed [4], using the validated integrated modeling IMAS-compatible HFPS framework [5], now including self-consistent EC wave predictions with TORBEAM [6], and complemented by standalone radiofrequency heating, turbulent transport and MHD analyses.

Simulations show that even at modest injected power ($P_{ECRH}=0.3$ MW), on-axis ECRH increases the accessible density range up to $n_{el}=7\cdot10^{19}$ $\mathrm{m^{-3}}$, ensuring central heating exceeds core W radiative losses (within $\rho<0.3$, $P_{rad}/P_{RF} < 0.3$). Central ECCD shifts LHCD profiles on-axis, while off-axis ECCD drives them further outward, modifying the total current and power density profiles. For comparable total power, adding on-axis ECCD to LHCD-only scenario results in a ~10% increase in energy confinement time, with similar overall current-drive efficiency. At the same time, ECCD substantially improves MHD robustness with a monotonous q-profile down to $q_{axis} = 1$. Conversely, off-axis ECCD enables accessing reversed shear configurations with reduced core turbulence but reduced stability margins. A potentially robust configuration is identified for $q_\min > 2$, although it requires precise control of the q-profile, from the ramp-up up to steady-state phase. These results provide quantitative guidance for upcoming combined LHCD/ECRH long pulse experiments on WEST.

[1] V. Ostuni et al., Nucl. Fusion, 62, 106034 (2022).
[2] P. Maget et al., Nucl. Fusion, 45, 69 (2005).
[3] L. Delpech et al., Fusion Engineering and Design, 186, 113360 (2023).
[4] T. Fonghetti, et al., Submitted to Nucl. Fusion (2025).
[5] T. Fonghetti et al., Nucl. Fusion, 65, 056018 (2025).
[6] E. Poli et al., Comp. Phys. Comm., 225, 36 (2018).

Author

Theo Fonghetti (CEA Cadarache & CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université)

Co-authors

Clarisse Bourdelle (CEA Cadarache) Enzo Vergnaud (CEA Cadarache) Francis Casson (UKAEA) Jean Cazabonne (CEA Cadarache) Jean-François Artaud (CEA Cadarache) Jorge Morales (CEA Cadarache) Ms Lena Delpech (CEA Cadarache) Mireille SCHNEIDER (ITER Organization) Patrick MAGET (CEA Cadarache) Pierre Manas (CEA Cadarache) Remi Dumont (CEA Cadarache) Dr Rui Coelho (Instituto de Plasmas e Fusao Nuclear)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.